Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 June 20223299681

22 Woodlands Grove, Stanningley, Pudsey, Leeds, LS28 6QQ

describe as ‘existing roof to be removed and replaced with new raised roof and side dormer. New eaves height to be raised in line with adjacent

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Cragg D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the area

What decided it

The proposal would appear disproportionately large, conspicuous and incongruous in the street scene due to its excessive vertical emphasis and prominent gable elevations on a corner plot, conflicting with design policies.

Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds Local Development Framework Core Strategy November 2014, Policy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006), Policy BD6 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.