Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 November 20223301584

80 Parkes Hall Road, Dudley, DY1 3RW

Planning appeal 3301584 at 80 Parkes Hall Road, Dudley, DY1 3RW (Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 16 November 2022 by Inspector Hall R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on highway safety, with particular regard to parking provision.

extension to create proposed ground floor flat

Authority
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hall R
Postcode
DY1 3RW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety, with particular regard to parking provision
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living condition of existing occupants of 80 Parkes Hall Road, with particular regard to access to private garden space
  • whether the proposal would provide suitable living conditions for its future occupants, with particular regard to outlook and access to private garden space

What decided it

The proposal would have an unacceptable effect on highway safety due to inadequate parking provision and would not provide suitable living conditions for future occupants due to lack of privacy in the garden space.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy L1Policy TRAN2Policy S6Policy HOU2Policy HOU1Policy CSP4Policy ENV2Policy ENV3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 111Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

41 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Dudley

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266010942
    Land Adj 110 Hagley Road, Halesowen, B63 4RL
  2. Allowed14 October 20266010351
    Unit 1 Parkbrook Industrial Estate, Park Street, Lye, DY9 8UH
  3. Allowed11 September 20266009469
    7, Market Street, Stourbridge, DY8 1AB
  4. Allowed7 August 20266006856
    Fircroft, 49 Birds Meadow, Pensnett, Brierley Hill, DY5 4TD
  5. Dismissed31 July 20266008454
    63 Dudley Road, Brierly Hill, Dudley, DY5 1HB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.