Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld31 August 20233301785

1 HURST LANE, EGHAM, SURREY, TW20 8QJ

without planning permission, the erection of a building as shown outlined and crosshatched blue on the Plan attached to the notice

Authority
Runnymede Borough Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Walker A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether, at the date the enforcement notice was issued, no enforcement action could be taken in respect of the breach of planning control alleged in the notice, on the basis that the operational development was substantially completed more than 4 years before the notice was issued

What decided it

The appellant failed to prove that the new building had been substantially completed by 25 May 2018, as photographic evidence showed the pre-existing building had ceased to exist by 7 May 2018 and the new building was still under construction in June 2018.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.