Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 March 20233302303

Kelima Portsmouth Road, Ripley, WOKING, GU23 6EW

the erection of two dwellings, the formation of a new access, the erection of a double garage following the demolition of the existing garage and conservatory

Authority
Guildford Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Redford R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect it has upon the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area; the living conditions of the occupants of Hi-Ash and The Retreat with specific regard to the privacy of their gardens; and the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (SPA)
  • if the development is inappropriate whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstance necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no clear outweighing benefits to justify very special circumstances.

The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt (inappropriate development and moderate harm to openness), substantial harm to living conditions of neighbours and the SPA, and moderate harm to character and appearance were not outweighed by the limited weight attributed to housing supply contribution and sustainable design benefits.

Framework references: 149, 147, 11

Plan policies cited: Policy P2, Policy D1, Policy G5, Policy LNPH3, Policy LNPH1, Policy P5, Policy NE4, Policy LNPEN2, Policy H4, Policy H1, Policy NRM6

Judgments cited: Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.