Planning appeal decision
Land at Land Parcel 2 North of Junction at Crossoak Lane and, Picketts Lane, Salfords, Surrey, RH1 5RG
Planning appeal 3302376 at Land at Land Parcel 2 North of Junction at Crossoak Lane and, Picketts Lane, Salfords, Surrey, RH1 5RG (Reigate and Banstead Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 11 May 2023 by Inspector Fleming D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the use on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it.
change of use of land to residential for three Gypsy and Traveller families. The site to contain three static caravans, three touring caravans, parking, hard standing and associated infrastructure. Summary
- Authority
- Reigate and Banstead Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Fleming D
- Postcode
- RH1 5RG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the use on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, having regard to its location within the Low Weald
- Whether the scale of the development is appropriate, having regard to the settled community and integration
- Whether harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The harm from inappropriateness, loss of Green Belt openness and encroachment was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations (including personal need and the children's best interests), so very special circumstances were not established.
The personal circumstances, best interests of the children, lack of alternative accommodation and unauthorised encampment risk did not, in combination, clearly outweigh the substantial harm from inappropriateness and significant harm to Green Belt openness and encroachment, together with moderate character/appearance harm and the intentional unauthorised development, so very special circumstances were not made out and the appeal was dismissed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DES7Policy CS3Policy CS16Policy NHE5Policy GTT1Policy CS2Policy NHE1Policy DES1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 174
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Reigate and Banstead Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Notice upheld24 September 20263363342117 Fountain Road, Redhill , Surrey, RH1 6QD
- Dismissed21 September 20266003001Eyhurst Farm House, Outwood Lane, Kingswood, KT20 6JS
- Notice upheld7 August 20263378370Land at Lower Duxhurst Farm, 15 Reigate Road, Sidlow, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 8QH
- Dismissed4 August 20266008838Ashdown, Margery Lane, Lower Kingswood, KT20 7BG
- Dismissed31 July 20266006064The Old Brewery - Smallfield Works, Station Road (Between 19 & 25), Horley, RH6 9HW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®