Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 December 20223302984

5 Church Gardens, Drighlington, Bradford, BD11 1NF

Planning appeal 3302984 at 5 Church Gardens, Drighlington, Bradford, BD11 1NF (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 22 December 2022 by Inspector Burnham T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on T2 (Common Lime tree protected by Tree Preservation Order) with particular regard to construction methods and development drainage as well as longer term impacts.

two storey extensions to side and rear of property, new entrance porch/canopy to front and new gate in boundary wall

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Burnham T
Postcode
BD11 1NF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on T2 (Common Lime tree protected by Tree Preservation Order) with particular regard to construction methods and development drainage as well as longer term impacts

What decided it

The resultant close proximity of the protected tree and the proposed extension would create significant future pressure to remove the tree, resulting in a significant adverse impact on the character and appearance of the area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P12 of the Leeds Core Strategy (2019)Policy LAND2 of the Natural Resources and Waste Local Plan (2013)Saved Policy LD1 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review (2006)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

37 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012772
    Lovell Park Hub, Wintoun Street, Leeds, LS7 1DA
  2. Dismissed20 October 20266012588
    Index House, 70 Burley Road, Leeds, LS3 1JX
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266012022
    5 Robins Grove, Rothwell, Leeds, LS26 0LE
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266010100
    Vacant Site, Ings Grove, Guiseley, LS20 9FR
  5. Dismissed15 October 20266010414
    Ground Floor, 106 Burley Road, Burley, Leeds, LS3 1JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.