Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 June 20233303036

163/163A St. Marys Lane, UPMINSTER, RM14 3BL

described in the

Authority
London Borough of Havering
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cowley R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development would provide satisfactory living conditions for its future occupiers, with particular regard to the provision of dual aspect accommodation and private outside space
  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties, with particular regard to outlook
  • Whether the development would provide adequate refuse and recycling storage facilities
  • Whether the development would provide an acceptable level of cycle parking
  • The effect of the development on car parking provision

What decided it

The cumulative harm to the living conditions of future and neighbouring occupiers and the lack of adequate refuse and recycling storage facilities significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest housing benefits when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.

The modest benefits of housing delivery and reuse of previously developed land were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the substantial cumulative harm to living conditions of future and neighbouring occupiers and inadequate waste storage provision.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy D6 of The London Plan March 2021, Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031, Policy 35 of the Local Plan, Policy 24 of the Local Plan, Policy T6 of the London Plan, Policy T6.1 of the London Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.