Planning appeal decision
Belair Toms Lane, Kings Langley, WD4 8NH
Planning appeal 3305196 at Belair Toms Lane, Kings Langley, WD4 8NH (Three Rivers District Council) was allowed on 24 August 2023 by Inspector Fallon R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development should make a contribution to affordable housing.
described on the application form as “Outline application for the construction of a new dwelling
- Authority
- Three Rivers District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Fallon R
- Postcode
- WD4 8NH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development should make a contribution to affordable housing
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and if so, the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The Council's substantial shortfall in five-year housing land supply (1.9 years) and the absence of any conflict with Green Belt policies meant the Framework's presumption in favour of sustainable development applied, and the housing delivery benefits attracted substantial weight that outweighed the conflict with the affordable housing policy.
the benefits of housing delivery in a sustainable village location, set against a substantial housing land supply deficit, outweighed the adverse impact of the absence of an affordable housing financial contribution from a single dwelling scheme
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP4Policy CP11Policy DM2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 64Paragraph 69Paragraph 74Paragraph 149Paragraph 219
- Judgments
- Wood v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Gravesham Borough Council [2014] EWHC 683 (Admin); Julian Wood v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195; Lee Valley Regional Park Authority v Epping Forest District Council [2015] EWHC 1471 (Admin); Lee Valley Regional Park Authority, R (on the application of) v Epping Forest District Council & Anor (Rev 1) [2016] EWCA Civ 404
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Three Rivers
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed24 September 20266010198Rusper, Nottingham Road, Heronsgate, WD3 5DN
- Dismissed12 August 20266006827Land Adjacent to Sarratt Lane, Loudwater, WD3 4AS
- Dismissed30 June 20266004957Land Adjoining Westwood End, Bucks Hill, Kings Langley, WD4 9AS
- Dismissed8 June 20266005787Popes Croft, Chandlers Lane, Rickmansworth, WD3 4NE
- Dismissed16 April 20266001382Old Farm Harthall Lane, Kings Langley, Please Select, WD4 8JW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®