Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 March 20233308189

Land North of Barking Road, Needham Market, IP6 8EZ

Planning appeal 3308189 at Land North of Barking Road, Needham Market, IP6 8EZ (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 31 March 2023 by Inspector Jordan A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal is in an appropriate location having regard to the impacts of flood risk and whether future occupiers would be safe from the impacts of flooding.

Outline planning application for the erection of up to 279 no. dwellings (both private & affordable) with associated access, onsite parking provision and open space

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Jordan A
Postcode
IP6 8EZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal is in an appropriate location having regard to the impacts of flood risk and whether future occupiers would be safe from the impacts of flooding
  • Whether the proposal would have an acceptable impact on highway safety
  • Whether occupants of the proposed development would have reasonable access to local employment, shops and services and whether the proposal makes appropriate provision for travel by sustainable transport modes
  • Whether future residents would enjoy acceptable levels of residential amenity, having regard to the proximity of Needham Market Football Club
  • The effects of the proposal on landscape character and the appearance of the surrounding area

What decided it

The proposal's failure to pass the flood risk Sequential Test (and by extension the Exception Test), given the site access lay within Flood Zone 3 with no flood modelling undertaken, was determinative on its own.

Moderate weight in favour from housing delivery, affordable housing, economic and ecological benefits, and limited weight from mitigation-related benefits (CIL, open space, education), did not outweigh harms from failed flood risk tests, highway safety, residential amenity impacts, landscape/character harm and agricultural land loss, so the proposal conflicted with the development plan as a whole and was dismissed.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H7Policy CS5Policy NM7Policy CL2Policy GP1Policy CS4Policy NM2Policy CS6Policy NM6Policy T10Policy T11Policy T12Policy RT12Policy CL11Policy CL8Policy H17Policy MP10Policy CS1Policy CS2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 130Paragraph 174

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

17 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed8 September 20266010228
    Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
  2. Allowed5 August 20266007731
    Hall Cottage, Stowmarket Road, Ringshall, IP14 2HZ
  3. Dismissed16 June 20266006315
    Orchard House, Cocks Road, Eye, IP23 7NT
  4. Dismissed12 June 20266004520
    Land at Flordon Road, Creeting St Mary, IP6 8NJ
  5. Notice upheld12 March 20263357418
    Vale Farm The Common, Metfield, Harleston, IP20 0LP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.