Planning appeal decision
Land South of Main Road, Curbridge, Oxon, OX29 7NT
Planning appeal 3310486 at Land South of Main Road, Curbridge, Oxon, OX29 7NT (West Oxfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 8 July 2024 by Inspector Middleton M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal is sustainable development that is in accordance with the Development Plan, when read as a whole, with particular reference to: (a) the scale and location of the proposed development in the context of the policy approach to housing development at Curbridge; (b) the development's impact on the listed Thatched Cottage; (c) the effect of the proposed development on the character of the area, including the form of the village and its landscape setting; (d) the effect of the proposal on the Public Right of Way that crosses the site and the proposed changes to the pedestrian network.
provision of up to 25 dwellings (including affordable housing and self-build housing) with access, parking, amenity space, open space, landscaping, drainage and associated works
- Authority
- West Oxfordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Middleton M
- Postcode
- OX29 7NT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal is sustainable development that is in accordance with the Development Plan, when read as a whole, with particular reference to: (a) the scale and location of the proposed development in the context of the policy approach to housing development at Curbridge; (b) the development's impact on the listed Thatched Cottage; (c) the effect of the proposed development on the character of the area, including the form of the village and its landscape setting; (d) the effect of the proposal on the Public Right of Way that crosses the site and the proposed changes to the pedestrian network
- Whether there are any benefits of the proposal that are of sufficient weight to outweigh the presumption in favour of determining planning applications in accordance with the Development Plan
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Grade II listed Thatched Cottage, combined with harm to the character, appearance and landscape setting of the village, was not outweighed by the benefits of the scheme.
The less than substantial harm to the listed building's significance, together with harm to character/appearance and landscape setting, outweighed the benefits of housing delivery including self/custom-build and affordable housing, tipping the balance against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy H1Policy H2Policy OS2Policy OS4Policy T1Policy T3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 60Paragraph 205Paragraph 208Paragraph 209
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Oxfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed30 June 20266005283Land West of The Nursery, 6 Oxford Road, Eynsham, OX29 4HG
- Dismissed18 February 20266000849Land Adjacent to Meadow View, Churchill, Oxfordshire, OX7 6PD
- Dismissed17 February 20266001780Building to South East of Mill House, Eynsham Road, Cassington, OX29 4DB
- Allowed1 December 20253363544Land At Brook Lane, Stonesfield, OX29 8PR
- Dismissed20 November 20253369835Land to the South of Heath Holm, New Yatt, Witney, OX29 6TE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®