Planning appeal decision
Forest Yard, Salters Lane, Siddington, Cheshire, SK11 9LH
Planning appeal 3310871 at Forest Yard, Salters Lane, Siddington, Cheshire, SK11 9LH (Cheshire East) was dismissed on 21 April 2023 by Inspector Gunn J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would be acceptable in principle in this location, having regard to local planning policy with regards to the location of employment development within the open countryside.
Change in use of land and buildings from a redundant horticultural nursery to a timber merchant
- Authority
- Cheshire East
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- employment-industrial · Minor offices/R&D/light industry
- Inspector
- Gunn J
- Postcode
- SK11 9LH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would be acceptable in principle in this location, having regard to local planning policy with regards to the location of employment development within the open countryside
- The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties, with particular regard to noise and disturbance
What decided it
The development conflicts with local planning policies protecting the open countryside because the timber merchant business does not meet the requirement that a countryside location be essential, and no substantive evidence was provided to demonstrate that alternative sites could not meet the appellants' requirements.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PG6 of the CELPSPolicy MP1 of the CELPSPolicy SD1 of the CELPSPolicy SD2 of the CELPSPolicy RUR10 of the SADPDPolicy SE12 of the CELPSPolicy RUR10.2.iii of the SADPDPolicy HOU12 of the SADPD
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 81Paragraph 84
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cheshire East
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed22 September 20266007456Brookfields Farm, Longhill Lane, Hankelow, CW3 0JQ
- Allowed22 September 20266007422Brookfields Farm, Longhill Lane, Hankelow, CW3 0JQ
- Dismissed25 August 202660073151/3 Park Lane, Macclesfield, SK11 6TJ
- Dismissed17 August 20263377066Station Yard, Wrenbury Road, Wrenbury, Nantwich, CW5 8HA
- Allowed9 July 20263377118Land To The North And South Of The A533 The Hill, Sandbach, CW11 2WE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®