Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed31 October 20233311567

Pavement Outside 33-39 Stoke Newington High Street, , Hackney, N16 8DR

Planning appeal 3311567 at Pavement Outside 33-39 Stoke Newington High Street, , Hackney, N16 8DR (London Borough of Hackney) was allowed on 31 October 2023 by Inspector Evans L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposals on the character and appearance and visual amenity of the area, including proposed lighting.

installation of a modern multifunction Hub unit featuring an integral advertisement display and defibrillator

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Other minor developments
Inspector
Evans L
Postcode
N16 8DR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposals on the character and appearance and visual amenity of the area, including proposed lighting
  • the effect of the proposal on public safety
  • the effect of the proposed development on opportunities for crime and anti-social behaviour

What decided it

The Inspector was satisfied that the proposal would not cause material harm to character and appearance, public safety, or crime and anti-social behaviour, and that it accorded with relevant development plan policies.

The identified benefits of the proposal, including community benefits and accordance with development plan policies, were not outweighed by any identified harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D4 of the London PlanPolicy D8 of the London PlanPolicy HC1 of the London PlanPolicy PP1 of the Hackney Local PlanPolicy LP1 of the Hackney Local PlanPolicy LP3 of the Hackney Local Plan

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 858 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hackney

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed6 August 20266010979
    Pavement O/S 383-385 Mare Street, London, E8 1HY
  2. Dismissed6 August 20266010978
    Pavement O/S 383-385 Mare Street, London, E8 1HY
  3. Dismissed20 July 20263375079
    Kebab Zero, 2 Kingsland Road, London, E2 8DA
  4. Dismissed9 July 20266004008
    42 Great Eastern Street, Hackney, London, EC2A3EP
  5. Dismissed26 March 20266003394
    360 Old Street, Hackney, London, EC1V 9LT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.