Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 August 20266010979

Pavement o/s 383-385 Mare Street, London, E8 1HY

a multifunctional communication Hub including defibrillator and advertisement display

Authority
London Borough of Hackney
Appeal type
advert · Commercial advertisement
Procedure
Written
Development
utilities-energy
Postcode
E8 1HY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including the Clapton Square Conservation Area and the setting of the Grade II listed building at 387 Mare Street
  • pedestrian movement, accessibility and public safety

What decided it

The less-than-substantial harm to the significance of the conservation area and the setting of the listed building, given considerable importance and weight under sections 66(1) and 72(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, was not outweighed by the modest public benefits of the proposal.

the less-than-substantial harm to the designated heritage assets, afforded considerable importance and weight, was not outweighed by the modest public benefits of the proposal

Plan policies cited: Hackney Local Plan (2020) Policy LP1, Hackney Local Plan (2020) Policy LP3, Hackney Local Plan (2020) Policy LP7, Hackney Local Plan (2020) Policy PP1, Hackney Local Plan (2020) Policy LP41, Hackney Local Plan (2020) Policy LP42, London Plan (2021) Policy D4, London Plan (2021) Policy D8, London Plan (2021) Policy HC1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.