Planning appeal decision
The Granary, Church Road, Baginton, CV8 3AR
Planning appeal 3312766 at The Granary, Church Road, Baginton, CV8 3AR (Warwick District Council) was dismissed on 27 April 2023 by Inspector Felgate J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would accord with the relevant local and national policies relating to development in Green Belts.
the erection of a single-storey dwelling
- Authority
- Warwick District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Felgate J
- Postcode
- CV8 3AR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would accord with the relevant local and national policies relating to development in Green Belts
- whether the development would accord with other relevant policies relating to the location of new housing development in the District
- the development's effects on the character and appearance of the area, including its effects on the Baginton Conservation Area
- the effects on highway safety
- whether any other matters add weight in favour of the development
- if the development is found to cause harm to the Green Belt, whether that harm, together with any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances that are necessary to justify development in Green Belts
What decided it
The substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriateness and loss of openness, combined with harm to the conservation area and conflict with housing location policy, is not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits claimed, and very special circumstances do not exist.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt and other harms (conflict with housing location policy and less-than-substantial harm to the conservation area) clearly outweigh the moderate benefits for housing provision and the local economy, and very special circumstances do not exist to justify the development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DS18Policy H1Policy H10Policy H11Policy BE1Policy HE1Policy TR1Policy BAG3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 201Paragraph 202
- Judgments
- J Wood v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Gravesham BC [2015] EWCA Civ 195
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Warwick
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed28 September 20266011601Quince Cottage, 4 The Bank, Stoneleigh, CV8 3DA
- Dismissed23 September 20266006637Land off Oakdene Crescent, Hatton, Warwick, CV35 7BN
- Dismissed5 August 20266007792Kenilworth Manor Nursing Home, Thickthorn Close, Kenilworth, CV8 2AF
- Allowed27 July 20266004371South Side, Wharf Lane, Lapworth, B94 6NR
- Allowed21 July 20266007706Valley House, Valley Lane, Lapworth, B94 6HB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®