Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 August 20233317202

39 St Helens Gate, Huddersfield, HD4 6SG

single storey rear extension with covered terrace

Authority
Kirklees Metropolitan Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hickey A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including the effect on openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the Almondbury Conservation Area
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial weight to be given to Green Belt harm combined with the disproportionate nature of the addition and harm to the conservation area character was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, such that very special circumstances did not exist.

Framework references: 137, 149, 150

Plan policies cited: Policy LP57, Policy LP24, Policy LP35

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.