Planning appeal decision
Land Adjoining Leckhampton Farm Court, Leckhampton, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL51 3GS
Planning appeal 3317851 at Land Adjoining Leckhampton Farm Court, Leckhampton, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL51 3GS (Cheltenham Borough Council) was allowed on 12 September 2023 by Inspector Sargent J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development accords with the spatial strategy for the distribution of housing.
a residential development of 30 dwellings (Class C3); vehicular, pedestrian and cycle access from Church Road; pedestrian and cycle access from Farm Lane; highways improvement works; public open space, landscaping, orchard planting and children's play space; surface water attenuation and other associated works
- Authority
- Cheltenham Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Sargent J
- Postcode
- GL51 3GS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development accords with the spatial strategy for the distribution of housing
- whether it would preserve the landscape and scenic beauty of the Cotswolds Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and preserve the character and appearance of the area
- its effect on ecology, including the Cotswold Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC)
- whether the nature and distribution of affordable housing is acceptable
- if harm would be caused by any or all of the above, whether that would be outweighed by material considerations
What decided it
The very large and pressing shortfall in the Council's housing land supply, engaging the tilted balance, meant the identified harms did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the scheme.
the harm to the spatial strategy and to the valued landscape did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing, economic benefits and biodiversity gains, given a very large and pressing housing land supply shortfall
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- SP2SD10SD4SD7D1LWH5LWH4SD12
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 92Paragraph 174Paragraph 176Paragraph 179Paragraph 180
- Judgments
- Stroud District Council v SSCLG & Gladman Developments Limited [2015] EWHC 488 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cheltenham Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed29 August 2025336576552 River Leys, Swindon Village, Cheltenham, GL51 9RY
- Allowed11 October 20233309156Land South of A46 Shurdington Road, Leckhampton, Cheltenham, GL53 0JN
- Allowed2 March 20233310455Adey Innovation Ltd, Gloucester Road, Cheltenham, GL51 8NR
- Allowed23 October 20266011141St Stephens Sports & Social Club, 52 Tivoli Street, Cheltenham, GL50 2UW
- Dismissed22 October 2026601452520 Marle Hill Road, Cheltenham, GL50 4LP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®