Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 September 20233319054

Beckside, Dam Hill, Huddersfield, HD8 0PX

a two storey rear extension

Authority
Kirklees Metropolitan Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Morgan R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework, including the effect on openness
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The cumulative effect of previous extensions and the proposed rear extension would mean the original building would no longer form the dominant element, constituting inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances to justify it.

Framework references: 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy LP57, Policy LP24

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.