Planning appeal decision
Land at Junction of Parkgrove and Princes Avenue, Park Grove, Hull, HU5 3QA
Planning appeal 3319927 at Land at Junction of Parkgrove and Princes Avenue, Park Grove, Hull, HU5 3QA (Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council) was dismissed on 25 January 2024 by Inspector Smith J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the street scene, with particular regard to the Princes Avenue Conservation Area and Grade II Listed buildings (the Church Tower and K8 telephone boxes) and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited in this position by taking into account any suitable alternative sites and the public benefits.
Proposed installation of telecommunications base station consisting of proposed 20m VF Hutchinson Apollo a 12RV2 medium duty active range pole accommodating 6 no VF antennas, 1 no VF GPS module, with 1 no VF Lancaster XES cabinet with sidepod and 1 no VF SFMC meter cabinet, along with ancillary equipment and apparatus thereto
- Authority
- Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Smith J
- Postcode
- HU5 3QA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the street scene, with particular regard to the Princes Avenue Conservation Area and Grade II Listed buildings (the Church Tower and K8 telephone boxes) and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited in this position by taking into account any suitable alternative sites and the public benefits
What decided it
The failure to demonstrate through a sufficiently rigorous sequential approach that there are no realistic opportunities to erect the installation in a different location where its siting and appearance would be less harmful to the conservation area and listed buildings.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 1Policy 14Policy 16Policy 24Strategic Priority 12
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed22 May 2026336048616 Melbourne Street, Hull, HU5 2ET
- Dismissed22 May 2026336047711 Melbourne Street, Hull, HU5 2ET
- Notice upheld22 May 20263359233113 Spring Bank, Hull, HU3 1BH
- Notice upheld22 May 20263359093113 Spring Bank, Hull, HU3 1BH
- Allowed19 May 202660043953 Norton Grove, Hull, HU4 6HG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®