Planning appeal decision
Highlands Farm, Long Itchington Road, Offchurch, Warwickshire, CV33 9AT
Planning appeal 3320052 at Highlands Farm, Long Itchington Road, Offchurch, Warwickshire, CV33 9AT (Warwick District Council) was dismissed on 15 March 2024 by Inspector Stephens K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
Self-build 3 bedroom NPPF Paragraph 80 dwelling
- Authority
- Warwick District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Stephens K
- Postcode
- CV33 9AT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect on the openness of the Green Belt and purposes of including land within it
- Whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for housing with regard to local and national policies
- Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of Offchurch Conservation Area
- The effect of the proposal on the landscape character of the area
- If the proposed development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and significant loss of openness, combined with harm to the Conservation Area and conflict with the development strategy, is not clearly outweighed by the public benefits of a single self-build dwelling, so very special circumstances do not exist.
The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt (by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness) and great weight given to harm to the Conservation Area were not outweighed by the moderate weight of self-build provision (reduced by lack of s.106 securing), limited weight of housing supply contribution, limited economic benefits, and limited weight of sustainability measures and biodiversity net gain.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DS18Policy H1Policy BE1Policy NE4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 80Paragraph 84Paragraph 138Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 149Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 205Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Warwick
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed28 September 20266011601Quince Cottage, 4 The Bank, Stoneleigh, CV8 3DA
- Dismissed23 September 20266006637Land off Oakdene Crescent, Hatton, Warwick, CV35 7BN
- Dismissed5 August 20266007792Kenilworth Manor Nursing Home, Thickthorn Close, Kenilworth, CV8 2AF
- Allowed27 July 20266004371South Side, Wharf Lane, Lapworth, B94 6NR
- Allowed21 July 20266007706Valley House, Valley Lane, Lapworth, B94 6HB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®