Planning appeal decision
Land off Lime Street, Eldersfield, Gloucestershire, GL19 4NE
Planning appeal 3320356 at Land off Lime Street, Eldersfield, Gloucestershire, GL19 4NE (Forest of Dean District Council) was allowed on 8 March 2024 by Inspector Walker K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site would be suitable for housing, having regard to the area's development strategy and the development proposed.
the change of use of an agricultural building to a dwellinghouse (Class C3) alongside associated building operations, and ancillary works
- Authority
- Forest of Dean District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Walker K
- Postcode
- GL19 4NE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site would be suitable for housing, having regard to the area's development strategy and the development proposed
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- whether material considerations exist that are sufficient to outweigh any conflict with development plan policy in respect of the above issues
What decided it
The existence of a genuine fallback position in the form of an extant planning permission for a substantially identical dwelling, which would moderate the conflict with the spatial strategy and Framework, combined with the Council's inability to demonstrate five-year housing land supply, meant the presumption in favour of sustainable development applied.
The conflict with the spatial strategy and Framework regarding isolated homes in the countryside was outweighed by the fallback position and the housing land supply benefits, along with economic, social and energy efficiency benefits, such that adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CSP.4CSP.5CSP.16CSP.1AP 1AP 4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 84Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- Hibbitt v SSCLG & Rushcliffe BC [2016] EWHC 2853 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Forest of Dean
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed19 May 20266002462Land at Moat Farm, Newent, GL181JG
- Allowed27 August 20253355832Forest Lodge St. Whites Road, Cinderford, GL14 3ES
- Allowed20 August 20253363981Land North East of Grove Lane , Lydney, Gloucestershire
- Allowed14 March 20253355043Barn, Joyford, Coleford, GL16 7AS
- Allowed12 February 20253353011Land at the Swan, Ledbury Road, Staunton, Gloucestershire, GL19 3QA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®