Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 November 20233321419

High Ryde Mays Green, Old Lane, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 1NJ

Planning appeal 3321419 at High Ryde Mays Green, Old Lane, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 1NJ (Guildford Borough Council) was dismissed on 15 November 2023 by Inspector Jolly J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would represent inappropriate development in the Metropolitan Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies.

for a retrospective application to incorporate as-built amendments to lawful development certificate 16/P/01670, approved on 04/10/2016 and planning permission 16/P/02587, approved on 14/02/2017; proposed two storey side extension, extension to approved two storey rear extension and loft conversion to habitable accommodation

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Jolly J
Postcode
KT11 1NJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would represent inappropriate development in the Metropolitan Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies

What decided it

The disproportionate additions to the original dwelling, comprising approximately 90% increase in floor space and substantial increases in scale, massing, height and bulk, constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt that cannot be justified by very special circumstances.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P2 of the Guildford Borough Local Plan Strategy and Sites (2019)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 151

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

105 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Guildford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed15 October 20266008529
    Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
  2. Allowed14 October 20266009751
    Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266009810
    Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL
  4. Allowed5 October 20266012736
    The Cottage, Blanket Mill Farm, Goose Rye Road, Worplesdon, Guildford, GU3 3RQ
  5. Dismissed23 September 20266009962
    Pentire, The Avenue, Worplesdon, GU3 3RA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.