Planning appeal decision
Cuckoo Farm , Southam Lane , Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL52 3PE
Planning appeal 3323753 at Cuckoo Farm , Southam Lane , Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL52 3PE (Tewkesbury Borough Council) was dismissed on 15 March 2024 by Inspector Marigold O, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including in respect of the openness of the Green Belt.
replacement of agricultural dwelling, landscaping and other associated works at Cuckoo Farm
- Authority
- Tewkesbury Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Marigold O
- Postcode
- GL52 3PE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including in respect of the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- whether an agricultural functional justification for the proposal is necessary and, if so, whether it has been demonstrated
- whether the proposal makes adequate provision for energy efficiency
- the effect of the proposal on protected species, in particular bats
- if the proposal is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal would cause substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and reduction in openness, and would harm character and appearance, agricultural worker accommodation, energy efficiency and protected species, with benefits that do not clearly outweigh these harms and therefore no very special circumstances exist to justify it.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- JCS Policy SD3JCS Policy SD4JCS Policy SD5JCS Policy SD10JCS Policy SD14TBLP Policy RES9TBLP Policy AGR3TBLP Policy NAT1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tewkesbury
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed4 August 20266004968Land Opposite Woodfold, Down Hatherley Lane, Down Hatherley, GL2 9QB
- Dismissed27 July 20266007203Chez Nous, The Rudge, Maisemore, GL2 8HX
- Dismissed26 June 20266007444Part Parcel 1800, Gander Lane, Teddington, Tewkesbury, GL20 8JA
- Dismissed19 June 20266004999124 Cheltenham Road, Bishops Cleeve, Cheltenham, GL52 8LZ
- Dismissed17 April 20266003223Plot to the South of Down Hatherley Lane, Down Hatherley, Tewkesbury Borough, Gloucestershire, GL2 9QB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®