Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 June 20243324074

Woodside Albury Heath, Albury, GUILDFORD, GU5 9DB

extension and alterations to the dwelling, including replacement studio/annexe; the erection of replacement garaging; a replacement swimming pool; garden landscape works; and demolition of 7 outbuildings

Authority
Guildford Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Glassar S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the Surrey Hills National Landscape
  • the function and scale of the extension/annex in relation to the main dwelling
  • the effect of the proposed development on protected species
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposed extension/annex and garage/home office constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause substantial harm to openness and the Surrey Hills National Landscape, with no very special circumstances demonstrated to justify the proposal.

Framework references: 11, 130, 142, 148, 154, 155, 182

Plan policies cited: Policy P2, Policy P1, Policy D1, Policy G5(2), Policy H4, Policy NE4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.