Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision4 October 20233325867

21 The Spires, Eccleston, St Helens, WA10 5GA

described on the application form as ‘single storey rear extension to form new open plan living, with first floor extension over garage to provide new office/utility at ground floor and bathroom and bedroom with en-suite and dresser at first floor

Authority
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Morgan R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect on the living conditions of the occupiers of 23-27 The Spires, with particular regard to outlook and overshadowing

What decided it

The first floor front extension would appear out of scale and not subservient to the main dwelling, with inappropriate materials and fenestration for the street character, and would create an overbearing impact on neighbouring properties' outlook, whereas the single storey rear extension would be acceptable and compliant with policy.

Plan policies cited: Policy LPD04, Householder Development Supplementary Planning Document 2011

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.