Planning appeal decision
1a Paternoster Row, Noak Hill, Romford, RM4 1LA
Planning appeal 3325919 at 1a Paternoster Row, Noak Hill, Romford, RM4 1LA (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 15 March 2024 by Inspector Nilsson A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
a retrospective application to retain existing outbuilding, retain part of the fence and removal of part timber and part steel hoarding and fence
- Authority
- London Borough of Havering
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Nilsson A
- Postcode
- RM4 1LA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the development on the living conditions of occupants of surrounding residential properties in terms of outlook and privacy
- If the development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing moderate harm to openness and minor harm to character and appearance, which is not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy G2 of the London Plan (2021)Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan (2021)Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan (2021)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Havering
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Notice upheld25 June 20263358682Chalkfields Tomkyns Lane, Upminster, RM14 1TP
- Split Decision23 June 20263377437Land Ne Side of Church Road, Noak Hill, Romford, Essex, RM4 1LD
- Split Decision23 June 20263377383Noak Hill, Romford, RM4 1LD
- Allowed10 April 20266001332Bush Farm Back Lakes, Aveley Road, Upminster, RM14 2TQ
- Allowed26 February 20266001099Havering Park Stables, Bower Farm Road, Havering-Atte-Bower, Romford, Greater London, RM4 1QR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®