Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Planning permission granted18 October 20243326405

21 Ellerker Gardens, Richmond, TW10 6AA

Planning appeal 3326405 at 21 Ellerker Gardens, Richmond, TW10 6AA (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was allowed on 18 October 2024 by Inspector Bale M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the Forticrete masonry finish on No 21 Ellerker Gardens as a non-designated heritage asset, and whether the development, as constructed, would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the St Matthius Conservation Area and avoid harm to its significance.

failure to comply with a condition imposed on a planning permission ref 20/1630/HOT granted on 4 September 2020

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Bale M
Postcode
TW10 6AA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the Forticrete masonry finish on No 21 Ellerker Gardens as a non-designated heritage asset, and whether the development, as constructed, would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the St Matthius Conservation Area and avoid harm to its significance.

What decided it

The rear elevations and ground floor extensions make only a limited contribution to the special interest and significance of the conservation area as they are not widely visible from public vantage points, and the Forticrete finish would not harm the character and appearance of the area when viewed from private gardens amongst existing contrasting projections.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP1Policy LP3Policy LP4

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

410 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Notice varied and upheld29 September 20263365429
    The Anglers Hotel, 3 Broom Road, Teddington, TW11 9NR
  2. Dismissed21 July 20263358690
    Mears Walk, Riverside, Richmond, Surrey, TW10 6UJ
  3. Dismissed21 July 20263353018
    Cambridge Gardens, Clevedon Rd, Twickenham, Middlesex, TW1 2TA
  4. Allowed21 July 20263348966
    River Thames Visitor Centre, Riverside, Richmond, TW10 6UJ
  5. Notice varied and upheld12 June 20263347022
    216 London Road, Twickenham, TW1 1EU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.