Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 July 20243326567

Springfiled Manor Nusing Home, Hogs Back, Puttenham, Surrey, GU3 1AQ

extensions and alterations to an existing residential care home including ancillary landscaping works and minor demolitions

Authority
Guildford Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
community-institutional · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Jolly J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the significance of the Puttenham Conservation Area and the setting of the surrounding listed buildings
  • the effect of the proposal on the scenic beauty of the National Landscape and Area of Great Landscape Value
  • the effect of the proposal on the biodiversity value of the appeal site

What decided it

The substantial harm to Green Belt openness from inappropriate development, combined with harm to the National Landscape and biodiversity concerns, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of additional care home provision and economic gains.

Framework references: 143, 154, 153, 205, 182, 180, 15, 16

Plan policies cited: Policy P2, Policy P-GP1, Policy D3, Policy D18, Policy D19, Policy D20, Policy P-BE4, Policy P-BE5, Policy P1, Policy P-NE1, Policy P7, Policy P-NE4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.