Oval Road Practice, 69 Oval Road North, Dagenham, RM10 9ET

Planning appeal 3326863 at Oval Road Practice, 69 Oval Road North, Dagenham, RM10 9ET (London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council) was dismissed on 8 August 2024 by Inspector Reid L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the principle of the proposed development would be acceptable, having regard to the location of the appeal site and the loss of the existing use.

change of use of the site from surgery Class E(e) to F1(f) place of worship and non-residential accommodation including relocation of a door from the side to the rear elevation and internal alterations

Authority: London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: community-institutional · Change of use
Inspector: Reid L
Postcode: RM10 9ET

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

whether the principle of the proposed development would be acceptable, having regard to the location of the appeal site and the loss of the existing use
the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupants, with regard to noise and disturbance
the effect of the proposal on parking and highway safety
whether the proposal would provide adequate cycle storage facilities

What decided it

The proposal would cause unacceptable harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupants through noise and disturbance from late evening opening hours and associated activity, and would generate undue parking pressure and highway safety harm that could not be adequately mitigated.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy BC6Policy S1Policy GG1Policy CC2Policy D13Policy D14Policy BP8Policy BD11Policy BR13Policy T6Policy BR9Policy T5Policy BR11
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 48

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

218 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

Dismissed8 May 20266002379
33 Sandown Avenue, Dagenham, RM10 8XD
Dismissed13 April 20266002839
22 Whitebarn Lane, Dagenham, RM10 9LH
Dismissed10 April 20266003483
12 Neville Gardens, Dagenham, Essex, RM8 3QT
Dismissed27 March 20263370715
82 Holgate Road, Dagenham, Essex, RM10 8NB
Notice varied and upheld27 March 20263340354
197 Broad Street, Dagenham, RM10 9JD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.