Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 March 20243327431

Land Adjacent to No. 1 Gade Bank, Croxley Green, Hertfordshire, WD3 3GD

Planning appeal 3327431 at Land Adjacent to No. 1 Gade Bank, Croxley Green, Hertfordshire, WD3 3GD (Three Rivers District Council) was dismissed on 18 March 2024 by Inspector Pearce J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of development plan policy and the Framework.

a two-storey dwelling with associated landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pearce J
Postcode
WD3 3GD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of development plan policy and the Framework
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • if it is inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
  • whether the proposal includes adequate provision for affordable housing

What decided it

The proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt which causes substantial harm to openness and fails to meet very special circumstances, and Green Belt protection policies provide a clear reason for refusal notwithstanding the shortfall in housing land supply.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and harm to openness was not clearly outweighed by the limited housing benefit and associated social and economic benefits, such that very special circumstances do not exist.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP11 of the Core Strategy (2011)Policy DM2 of the Development Management Policies Local Development Document (2013)Policy CP4 of the Core Strategy (2011)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

163 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Three Rivers

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed24 September 20266010198
    Rusper, Nottingham Road, Heronsgate, WD3 5DN
  2. Dismissed12 August 20266006827
    Land Adjacent to Sarratt Lane, Loudwater, WD3 4AS
  3. Dismissed30 June 20266004957
    Land Adjoining Westwood End, Bucks Hill, Kings Langley, WD4 9AS
  4. Dismissed8 June 20266005787
    Popes Croft, Chandlers Lane, Rickmansworth, WD3 4NE
  5. Dismissed16 April 20266001382
    Old Farm Harthall Lane, Kings Langley, Please Select, WD4 8JW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.