Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 March 20243327431

Land adjacent to No. 1 Gade Bank, Croxley Green, Hertfordshire, WD3 3GD

a two-storey dwelling with associated landscaping

Authority
Three Rivers District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pearce J
Postcode
WD3 3GD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of development plan policy and the Framework
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • if it is inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
  • whether the proposal includes adequate provision for affordable housing

What decided it

The proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt which causes substantial harm to openness and fails to meet very special circumstances, and Green Belt protection policies provide a clear reason for refusal notwithstanding the shortfall in housing land supply.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and harm to openness was not clearly outweighed by the limited housing benefit and associated social and economic benefits, such that very special circumstances do not exist.

Framework references: 154, 11

Plan policies cited: Policy CP11 of the Core Strategy (2011), Policy DM2 of the Development Management Policies Local Development Document (2013), Policy CP4 of the Core Strategy (2011)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.