Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to No. 1 Gade Bank, Croxley Green, Hertfordshire, WD3 3GD
Planning appeal 3327431 at Land Adjacent to No. 1 Gade Bank, Croxley Green, Hertfordshire, WD3 3GD (Three Rivers District Council) was dismissed on 18 March 2024 by Inspector Pearce J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of development plan policy and the Framework.
a two-storey dwelling with associated landscaping
- Authority
- Three Rivers District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Pearce J
- Postcode
- WD3 3GD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of development plan policy and the Framework
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- if it is inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
- whether the proposal includes adequate provision for affordable housing
What decided it
The proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt which causes substantial harm to openness and fails to meet very special circumstances, and Green Belt protection policies provide a clear reason for refusal notwithstanding the shortfall in housing land supply.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and harm to openness was not clearly outweighed by the limited housing benefit and associated social and economic benefits, such that very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP11 of the Core Strategy (2011)Policy DM2 of the Development Management Policies Local Development Document (2013)Policy CP4 of the Core Strategy (2011)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Three Rivers
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed24 September 20266010198Rusper, Nottingham Road, Heronsgate, WD3 5DN
- Dismissed12 August 20266006827Land Adjacent to Sarratt Lane, Loudwater, WD3 4AS
- Dismissed30 June 20266004957Land Adjoining Westwood End, Bucks Hill, Kings Langley, WD4 9AS
- Dismissed8 June 20266005787Popes Croft, Chandlers Lane, Rickmansworth, WD3 4NE
- Dismissed16 April 20266001382Old Farm Harthall Lane, Kings Langley, Please Select, WD4 8JW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®