Planning appeal decision
Keepers Lodge Basingstoke Road, Beech, ALTON, GU34 4AB
- Authority
- East Hampshire District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Boffin D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal sites are suitable locations for the alleged breaches of planning control, with regard to relevant development plan policies (Appeals A and B)
- The effect of the alleged breaches of planning control on the character and appearance of the surrounding area (Appeals A, B and C)
- The effect of the alleged breaches of planning control on the living conditions of the occupiers of Keeper's Lodge (Appeals A, B and C)
- The effect of the alleged breaches of planning control on the living conditions of the occupiers of the development (Appeals A and B)
- Whether the developments provide sufficient parking and refuse facilities (Appeals A, B and C)
- Whether the personal circumstances of the current occupier/s overcome any identified harm (Appeals A and B)
What decided it
The Inspector's finding that the developments accorded with the development plan taken as a whole, reinforced by the tilted balance applying due to the Council's lack of a five-year housing land supply.
No adverse impacts of granting permission would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits (housing provision, sustainable rural location, design compliance) when assessed against the Framework as a whole, tipping in favour of allowing the appeals.
Framework references: 11, 83, 84, 110, 135
Plan policies cited: Policy CP2, Policy CP6, Policy CP9, Policy CP10, Policy CP19, Policy CP20, Policy CP24, Policy CP27, Policy CP29, Policy CP31, Policy C14, Policy BPC02, Policy BPC03, Policy BPC06, Policy BPC07, Policy BPC12
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®