Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 June 20243328689

Wishing Well, The Street, Happisburgh, Norwich, Norfolk, NR12 0AB

Planning appeal 3328689 at Wishing Well, The Street, Happisburgh, Norwich, Norfolk, NR12 0AB (North Norfolk District Council) was dismissed on 7 June 2024 by Inspector Hickey A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, and the effect that it would have upon the living conditions of the occupiers of the existing property.

full planning application to make a material change of use for the detached building to the frontage of the wishing well dwelling house as required under part 3 of the town & country planning act 1990 amended

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Hickey A
Postcode
NR12 0AB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, and the effect that it would have upon the living conditions of the occupiers of the existing property
  • the effect of the proposed development upon highway safety

What decided it

The significant and demonstrable harm to living conditions of both the existing and proposed occupiers and to highway safety outweighs the limited benefits of delivering one additional dwelling in circumstances where the tilted balance applies.

The harm identified (unacceptable impact on living conditions and harmful effect on highway safety) significantly and demonstrably outweighs the limited social and economic benefits of delivering an additional dwelling, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EN4Policy CT5Policy CT6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11
Judgments
Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWCH 2823 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

9 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in North Norfolk

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed15 October 20266012084
    Hall Farm Barns, Station Road, Thorpe Market, NR11 8UD
  2. Dismissed22 September 20266008881
    The Old Post House, Mundesley Road, Trimingham, NR11 8DZ
  3. Dismissed29 January 20263370351
    Sharrington Strawberries , Melton Constable , NR24 2PH
  4. Allowed1 September 20253356340
    Smallburgh Hall, Hall Drive, Smallburgh, Norfolk, NR12 9FW
  5. Dismissed1 August 20253364842
    Lilac Cottage , Knapton Road , North Walsham , Norfolk, Nr28 0RP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.