Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 March 20243330187

63 Winrose Drive, Belle Isle, LEEDS, LS10 3HP

a single storey side extension of the dwelling in order to accommodate a bedroom and a wet room for a disabled person

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Kempton N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • amenity and highway safety
  • the appellant's personal circumstances

What decided it

The three design elements of the extension—its width, flush front wall position, and low monopitch roof form—would cause very significant harm to the distinctive character and appearance of the area, which could not be justified by the benefits to the disabled occupant.

Framework references: 12

Plan policies cited: UDP policy BD6, UDP policy GP5, Leeds Core Strategy 2019 policy P10, Leeds Core Strategy 2019 policy T2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.