Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 February 20243330402

339 Saffron Lane, Leicester, LE2 6UE

Planning appeal 3330402 at 339 Saffron Lane, Leicester, LE2 6UE (Leicester City Council) was dismissed on 21 February 2024 by Inspector Wilson D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to internal space, outlook, daylight and privacy.

change of use from house in multiple occupation (6 Beds) to five self-contained flats (1x 5 Bed) (Class C3); construction of dormer extensions at front and rear; single and two storey extension at rear; alterations

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wilson D
Postcode
LE2 6UE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to internal space, outlook, daylight and privacy
  • the effect on the living conditions of the occupiers of 337 Saffron Lane and the bedsit above 112 Grace Road with particular regard to outlook

What decided it

The adverse impacts on the living conditions of future and neighbouring occupiers would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the very modest housing benefits.

The benefits of housing delivery, to which significant weight was attached, were outweighed by the significant adverse impacts on the living conditions of future and neighbouring occupiers, such that the proposal would not constitute sustainable development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy PS10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 76Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

85 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leicester

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed14 October 20253367909
    83 Lytton Road, Leicester, LE2 1WL
  2. Dismissed23 November 20233305526
    7 Holmwood Drive, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE3 9LG
  3. Dismissed4 April 20233307220
    3 - 5 Bramley Road, Leicester, LE3 9DA
  4. Dismissed14 October 20266008650
    3-5 London Street, Leicester, LE5 3RL
  5. Dismissed6 October 20266011885
    16 Sutton Avenue, Leicester, LE4 6RT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.