Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 September 20243331062

Land at Junction of Vaughan Way and St Margaret's Way, Leicester , LE1 4QF

Planning appeal 3331062 at Land at Junction of Vaughan Way and St Margaret's Way, Leicester , LE1 4QF (Leicester City Council) was dismissed on 3 September 2024 by Inspector Jones G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The proposed development's effect on the character and appearance of the area.

outline application for construction of a 9 and 7 storey building to provide 104 flats (63 x 1 bed, 41 x 2 bed) (Class C3) with access, appearance, layout and scale committed and other matters (landscaping) reserved

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Jones G
Postcode
LE1 4QF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The proposed development's effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • Its effect on the significance of designated heritage assets, including the grade II listed building the Former Richard Roberts Factory
  • Its effect on archaeological remains
  • Its effect on the living conditions of occupants of the neighbouring properties, The Annexe and The Chimney, having particular regard to outlook, light and privacy
  • Whether the proposed development would secure acceptable living conditions for future occupiers
  • Whether it would provide adequate refuse facilities for occupants
  • Whether it would provide suitable vehicular access, cycle parking and service provision
  • Whether it would meet 'Building Regulations Category M4(2) Accessible and adaptable dwellings'
  • Whether it would secure sufficient Biodiversity Net Gain
  • In the event that the proposed development were to give rise to any harm, whether any such harm would be outweighed by any benefits

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the grade II listed Former Richard Roberts Factory, when balanced against the public benefits under Framework paragraph 208, was insufficient to justify the development, and the tilted balance did not apply.

The public benefits of delivering 104 homes on an unsightly, underused site in a sustainable location with good facilities, in an area with a significant housing land supply shortfall, were not sufficient to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the significance of the listed building, the significant harm to character and appearance, and the significant harm to neighbouring residents' living conditions.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS Policy 3 (Designing Quality Places)CS Policy 18 (Historic Environment)CS Policy 17 (Biodiversity)CS Policy 6 (Housing Strategy)CS Policy 15 (Managing Demand for Car Use)CS Policy 14 (The Transport Network)Policy PS10 (Residential Amenity and New Development)Policy PS11 (Protection from Pollution)Policy H07 (Flat Conversions and New Build Flats)Policy AM02 (Cycling and Development)Leicester Waterside Supplementary Planning Document
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

175 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leicester

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed21 August 20266010430
    Regency House, 65 New Bridge Street, Leicester, LE2 7JR
  2. Allowed12 August 20266007781
    7 Park Hill Drive, Leicester, LE2 8HS
  3. Dismissed24 July 20266007801
    91 Catherine Street, Leicester, LE4 6EP
  4. Dismissed29 May 20266007005
    21 Evington Lane, Leicester, LE5 5PQ
  5. Allowed2 April 20266003524
    23 St Johns Road, Leicester, LE2 2BL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.