Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 June 20243331677

Land Fronting, 21 Dalton Close, London, BR6 9QY

Planning appeal 3331677 at Land Fronting, 21 Dalton Close, London, BR6 9QY (London Borough of Bromley) was dismissed on 6 June 2024 by Inspector Owen A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposals on the character and appearance of the area, including protected trees.

erection of a two storey 3-bedroom detached dwellinghouse

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Owen A
Postcode
BR6 9QY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposals on the character and appearance of the area, including protected trees
  • the living conditions of nearby occupiers, and on future occupiers of the development, with respect to privacy
  • surface water flooding

What decided it

The substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area through loss of a protected tree and incongruous detached form, combined with inadequate private garden space and unresolved surface water flooding risk, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest housing supply benefits.

The modest housing supply benefits of a single dwelling, which could be built out quickly and was well-located for sustainable transport, were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by substantial harm to character and appearance, failure to provide adequate private amenity space, and unresolved flood risk.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 37Policy 73Policy 74Policy 8Policy 6Policy 115Policy 116Policy SI 13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 60Paragraph 70Paragraph 135Paragraph 157

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

339 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Bromley

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed10 April 20266000829
    6 Woodlands Road, Bickley, Bromley, Kent, BR1 2AD
  2. Dismissed15 December 20256000618
    44 Rutland Way, Orpington, BR5 4DZ
  3. Allowed9 June 20253359027
    70 Goddington Lane, Orpington, BR6 9DY
  4. Dismissed7 February 20243324603
    10 Bromley Common, Bromley, BR2 9PD
  5. Dismissed16 June 20233311121
    8 Green Close, Bromley, BR2 0HJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.