Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 May 20243332178

11 St. Pauls Road, Tottenham, London, N17 0NB

Planning appeal 3332178 at 11 St. Pauls Road, Tottenham, London, N17 0NB (London Borough of Haringey) was dismissed on 20 May 2024 by Inspector Sibley G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Effect of the proposal upon the living conditions of the occupants of the proposed Studio Flat and the occupiers of 11 St Pauls Road as well as other neighbouring occupiers with regard to outlook, privacy, noise and disturbance as well as access by fire appliances.

change of use of an existing outbuilding to provide for a self-contained Studio Flat

Authority
London Borough of Haringey
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Sibley G
Postcode
N17 0NB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Effect of the proposal upon the living conditions of the occupants of the proposed Studio Flat and the occupiers of 11 St Pauls Road as well as other neighbouring occupiers with regard to outlook, privacy, noise and disturbance as well as access by fire appliances

What decided it

The proposal would harm the living conditions of both the occupants of the proposed Studio Flat and the occupiers of No 11 through enclosed outlook, noise and disturbance, and privacy erosion, which conflicts with development plan policies safeguarding living conditions and outweighs the modest benefits of the scheme.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3Policy D6Policy D12Policy SP11Policy DM1Policy DM7Policy DM12
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 124Paragraph 70

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

330 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Haringey

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed14 October 20266008251
    6 Ewart Grove, Wood Green, London, N22 5NX
  2. Allowed13 October 20266010745
    Rakkas 365-369 Green Lanes, Haringey, London, N4 1DY
  3. Dismissed9 October 20266011332
    5 Kimberley Gardens, Tottenham, London, N4 1LB
  4. Dismissed8 July 20266004944
    9, Brampton Park Road, Wood Green, N22 6BG
  5. Dismissed8 July 20266004943
    8, Brampton Park Road, Wood Green, N22 6BG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.