Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 September 20243333620

Ivy House, Southolt Road, Athelington, Eye, Suffolk, IP21 5EL

Planning appeal 3333620 at Ivy House, Southolt Road, Athelington, Eye, Suffolk, IP21 5EL (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 9 September 2024 by Inspector Spencer D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site would be a sustainable location for residential development.

erection of 1 No. dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Spencer D
Postcode
IP21 5EL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site would be a sustainable location for residential development
  • whether the appeal site would be of a sufficient size for the development proposed
  • whether future occupiers of the proposed dwelling would have acceptable living conditions with regards to noise and odour due to the proximity of poultry units to the north-west of the appeal site

What decided it

The appeal site's location outside any settlement boundary in unsustainable countryside, combined with the inadequate size of the defined red-line plot to accommodate acceptable living conditions, meant the proposal conflicted with the up-to-date development plan and could not be justified by the limited housing benefits.

The social and economic benefits of a single dwelling were given only very limited weight and did not outweigh the conflict with the up-to-date development plan

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP03Policy LP01Policy LP24
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135Paragraph 70Paragraph 193

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

7 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed8 September 20266010228
    Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
  2. Allowed5 August 20266007731
    Hall Cottage, Stowmarket Road, Ringshall, IP14 2HZ
  3. Dismissed16 June 20266006315
    Orchard House, Cocks Road, Eye, IP23 7NT
  4. Notice upheld12 March 20263357418
    Vale Farm The Common, Metfield, Harleston, IP20 0LP
  5. Allowed22 October 20253369566
    Fennings Farm, Pixey Green, Stradbroke, Eye Suffolk, IP21 5NH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.