Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed13 November 20243335883

Land to rear of Karenza, Hook Lane, Aldingbourne, CHICHESTER, PO20 3TB

construction of 5no. dwellings, landscaping and associated works

Authority
Arun District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Shearing C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would make an appropriate contribution to affordable housing

What decided it

The appeal site should not be treated as an additional phase of the Autumn Gate development, therefore the proposal does not trigger an affordable housing requirement under Policy AH SP2.

The benefits of housing delivery and compliance with the presumption in favour of sustainable development outweighed the concerns of local residents regarding loss of open space and change in outlook, with no other adverse impacts identified.

Framework references: 11, 14

Plan policies cited: Policy AH SP2, Policy ENV DM4, Policy WDM3, Policy WDM2, Policy H3, Policy H6, Policy EH6, Policy EH5

Judgments cited: R (Westminster City Council) v First Secretary of State and Brandlord Limited [2003] J.P.L 1066; New Dawn Homes Ltd v SSCLG [2016] EWHC 3314 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.