Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 May 20243337982

96 Ashton Avenue, Rainhill, L35 0QR

the erection of timber fencing to the rear garden, safety railing to the southern side of the house, rendered masonry walls and pillars with infill railings and automatic gate to the front of the house

Authority
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Hartley S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the area
  • Highway and pedestrian safety

What decided it

The front boundary treatment would cause unacceptable harm to both the character and appearance of the area and highway and pedestrian safety through insufficient intervisibility at the driveway.

Framework references: 115

Plan policies cited: LPD04, LPA06

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.