Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 August 20243338921

Nando's, St Michaels Court, 1 Shire Oak Street, Headingley, Leeds, LS6 2AF

Planning appeal 3338921 at Nando's, St Michaels Court, 1 Shire Oak Street, Headingley, Leeds, LS6 2AF (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 9 August 2024 by Inspector Francis M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether condition 12 is necessary and reasonable with regards to the effect on highway safety.

removal of condition no 12 (delivery service) of planning permission 13/05581/FU in order to allow to continue to offer takeaway sales via third party collection services

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Change of use
Inspector
Francis M
Postcode
LS6 2AF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether condition 12 is necessary and reasonable with regards to the effect on highway safety

What decided it

The removal of condition 12 would have an unacceptable effect on highway safety due to the limited capacity of Wood Lane, existing congestion, and the inability to enforce compliance with an operational management plan when the delivery service is operated by a third party.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy T2 of the Leeds Local Plan Core Strategy 2014Policy GP5 of Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review 2006
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 205

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

169 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266011321
    Land to the Rear of, 14 to 16 Cross Hills Kippax, Kippax, LS25 7JP
  2. Dismissed21 September 20266009737
    12 Hyde Park Terrace, Leeds, LS6 1BJ
  3. Dismissed4 September 20266010416
    Stonewood, Almshouse Hill, Leeds, LS23 6QX
  4. Allowed3 September 20266007907
    9 Vinery Grove, Richmond Hill, Leeds, LS9 9LT
  5. Dismissed14 August 20266006204
    193 Easterly Road, Leeds, LS8 2RB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.