Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed28 October 20243339805

Land at Littywood Farm, Dunston, Coppenhill, South Staffordshire, ST18 9AH

Planning appeal 3339805 at Land at Littywood Farm, Dunston, Coppenhill, South Staffordshire, ST18 9AH (South Staffordshire District Council) was allowed on 28 October 2024 by Inspector Plenty B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including landscape and visual aspects.

the installation of a ground mounted solar array and associated infrastructure

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Minor offices/R&D/light industry
Inspector
Plenty B
Postcode
ST18 9AH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including landscape and visual aspects
  • Whether or not the proposal would preserve the setting of The Toft, a Grade II Listed building
  • The effect of the proposed development on, and the potential loss of, agricultural land

What decided it

The substantial public benefits of renewable energy generation and biodiversity net gain, combined with the temporary nature of the development and the rational site selection based on grid connection requirements, outweighed the moderate landscape and visual harm and less than substantial heritage harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS Policy OC1CS Policy EQ4CS Policy EQ3CS Policy EQ6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 163Paragraph 174Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

4 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Staffordshire District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed15 May 20266005615
    3 Farm Close, Wolverhampton, WV8 1JU
  2. Allowed6 March 20263367246
    Land at Wulfrun Way, Broad Lane, Mossley, WV11 2DZ
  3. Dismissed4 February 20263374824
    The Staffordshire Golf Club, Bridgnorth Road, Swindon, Dudley, DY3 4PU
  4. Allowed18 November 20253368369
    Land East of the A449, North of Penkridge, Penkridge, ST19 5FL
  5. Allowed8 May 20253355879
    Land at Orton Hall Farm, Flash Lane, Orton, Wolverhampton, WV4 4TF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.