Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 September 20243341159

Land Between, 124 - 183 Wild Hill, Teversal, Sutton in Ashfield, Nottingham, NG17 3JE

Planning appeal 3341159 at Land Between, 124 - 183 Wild Hill, Teversal, Sutton in Ashfield, Nottingham, NG17 3JE (Ashfield District Council) was dismissed on 18 September 2024 by Inspector Savage K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be a suitable location for housing, having regard to the effect on character, appearance and openness.

3 no. dwellings

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Savage K
Postcode
NG17 3JE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be a suitable location for housing, having regard to the effect on character, appearance and openness
  • whether or not the site is in an accessible location relative to services and facilities
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety

What decided it

The cumulative weight of conflicts with the development plan's spatial strategy, poor accessibility requiring reliance on private cars, harm to countryside character and openness, and unacceptable highway safety risks outweighed the modest housing supply benefit even in the context of the Council's housing shortfall.

the identified harms arising from conflict with the spatial strategy, poor accessibility, adverse effects on character and appearance and highway safety significantly and demonstrably outweighed the identified benefits of three dwellings and economic benefits, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ST4Policy EV2Policy ST1Policy HG5Policy NP1Policy NP2Policy NP4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 226

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

25 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Ashfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed28 January 20266001120
    Land Between 124 and 142 Church Lane, Selston, Nottinghamshire, NG16 6FD
  2. Allowed3 November 20253366321
    Cedar House, Silverhill Lane, Teversal, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, NG17 3JJ
  3. Dismissed27 October 20253364793
    Whitboro Lodge at 261 Wild Hill, Teversal, Nottinghamshire, NG17 3JF
  4. Allowed19 June 20253356635
    Melbourne Farmhouse, 86 Inkerman Road, Selston, Nottinghamshire, NG16 6BN
  5. Dismissed20 January 20253347049
    Land Between 124 and 142, Church Lane, Selston, NG16 6FD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.