Planning appeal decision
Land on the southwest side of Levedale Road, Penkridge, Staffordshire, ST18 9AH
the construction and operation of a battery energy storage facility and substation with associated fencing and landscaping
- Authority
- South Staffordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- utilities-energy · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Berry A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- whether any conflict with the development plan that may arise in respect of the proposal is outweighed by material considerations
What decided it
The significant weight afforded to the proposal's contribution to climate change and net zero outweighed the identified landscape character harm and conflict with the development plan.
The harm to landscape character and conflict with CS Policies OC1, EQ4 and EQ12 was outweighed by the significant weight given to climate change/net zero benefits and moderate weight given to the WMS, biodiversity net gain and economic benefits.
Framework references: 47, 180, 11
Plan policies cited: CS Policy OC1, CS Policy EQ4, CS Policy EQ12
Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another, Queen's Bench Division 24 October 1980; Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (admin)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®