Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 August 20266007901

17 Church Road, Codsall, WV8 1EA

first floor extension of the commercial premises approved under application 25/00437/FUL to provide 5 no. residential apartments, with associated landscaping and car parking

Authority
South Staffordshire District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
WV8 1EA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to outside space and internal space
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to privacy
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The failure to provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers due to the inadequate usability of the proposed outside space, which is a significant and enduring harm that substantially outweighs the benefits of housing delivery despite the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.

The significant positive weight afforded to housing delivery in the context of a very substantial shortfall in five-year housing land supply and the limited benefits from use of previously developed land, density increase, and economic benefits were substantially outweighed by the significant and enduring harm to living conditions of future occupiers arising from inadequate outside space.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy EQ9, Policy EV12, Policy EV11, Policy EQ4, Core Policy 4, Policy EQ11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.