Planning appeal decision
46 North Trade Road, Battle, East Sussex, TN33 0HS
Planning appeal 3345193 at 46 North Trade Road, Battle, East Sussex, TN33 0HS (Rother District Council) was dismissed on 21 January 2025 by Inspector Francis L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to whether the proposal would conserve and enhance the landscape, scenic and natural beauty of the High Weald National Landscape.
the part-demolition of No 46 and subsequent erection of 4 pairs of 4-bed semi-detached dwelling-houses, construction of access drive and associated scheme of hard and soft landscaping
- Authority
- Rother District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Francis L
- Postcode
- TN33 0HS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to whether the proposal would conserve and enhance the landscape, scenic and natural beauty of the High Weald National Landscape
- whether the proposal would provide a suitable range of housing sizes
- the effect of the proposal on biodiversity
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 44 and 46 North Trade Road, in respect of noise and disturbance
What decided it
The proposal would cause harm to the character and appearance of the High Weald National Landscape, a protected area identified in footnote 7 of Framework paragraph 11(d) as providing a strong reason for refusal that displaces the presumption in favour of sustainable development despite the housing land supply shortfall.
The moderate benefits of housing delivery and socio-economic benefits were outweighed by the significant harm to the National Landscape character and appearance, the failure to provide a suitable housing mix, and the unresolved biodiversity concerns, with the National Landscape designation providing a strong reason for refusal under the Framework.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EN1(i) of the Rother Local Plan Core Strategy 2014Policy DEN2 of the Development and Site Allocations Local Plan 2019Policy EN3 of the Core StrategyPolicy OSS4 of the Core StrategyPolicy BA1 of the Core StrategyPolicy EN5 of the Core StrategyPolicy DEN4 of the DASAPolicy LHN1 of the Core StrategyPolicy HD3 of the Battle Civil Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2020-2028Policy HD4 of the Battle Civil Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2020-2028Policy HD5 of the Battle Civil Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2020-2028Policy HD6 of the Battle Civil Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2020-2028Policy DIM2 of the Core Strategy
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 189Paragraph 193Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rother District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed14 October 20266007775Land Adjacent to Broadlawns, Whitebread Lane, Beckley, TN31 6TY
- Dismissed17 August 20266009653150 Barnhorn Road, Bexhill on Sea, TN39 4QL
- Dismissed12 May 2026600282154-55 High Street, Battle, TN33 0EN
- Allowed29 September 20253354261Former Moorhurst Care Home, Main Road , Westfield, East Sussex, TN35 4SL
- Dismissed10 June 20253352770George Inn, High Street, Robertsbridge, TN32 5AW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®