Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 January 20253345193

46 North Trade Road, Battle, East Sussex, TN33 0HS

Planning appeal 3345193 at 46 North Trade Road, Battle, East Sussex, TN33 0HS (Rother District Council) was dismissed on 21 January 2025 by Inspector Francis L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to whether the proposal would conserve and enhance the landscape, scenic and natural beauty of the High Weald National Landscape.

the part-demolition of No 46 and subsequent erection of 4 pairs of 4-bed semi-detached dwelling-houses, construction of access drive and associated scheme of hard and soft landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Francis L
Postcode
TN33 0HS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to whether the proposal would conserve and enhance the landscape, scenic and natural beauty of the High Weald National Landscape
  • whether the proposal would provide a suitable range of housing sizes
  • the effect of the proposal on biodiversity
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 44 and 46 North Trade Road, in respect of noise and disturbance

What decided it

The proposal would cause harm to the character and appearance of the High Weald National Landscape, a protected area identified in footnote 7 of Framework paragraph 11(d) as providing a strong reason for refusal that displaces the presumption in favour of sustainable development despite the housing land supply shortfall.

The moderate benefits of housing delivery and socio-economic benefits were outweighed by the significant harm to the National Landscape character and appearance, the failure to provide a suitable housing mix, and the unresolved biodiversity concerns, with the National Landscape designation providing a strong reason for refusal under the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EN1(i) of the Rother Local Plan Core Strategy 2014Policy DEN2 of the Development and Site Allocations Local Plan 2019Policy EN3 of the Core StrategyPolicy OSS4 of the Core StrategyPolicy BA1 of the Core StrategyPolicy EN5 of the Core StrategyPolicy DEN4 of the DASAPolicy LHN1 of the Core StrategyPolicy HD3 of the Battle Civil Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2020-2028Policy HD4 of the Battle Civil Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2020-2028Policy HD5 of the Battle Civil Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2020-2028Policy HD6 of the Battle Civil Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2020-2028Policy DIM2 of the Core Strategy
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 189Paragraph 193Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

23 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rother District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed14 October 20266007775
    Land Adjacent to Broadlawns, Whitebread Lane, Beckley, TN31 6TY
  2. Dismissed17 August 20266009653
    150 Barnhorn Road, Bexhill on Sea, TN39 4QL
  3. Dismissed12 May 20266002821
    54-55 High Street, Battle, TN33 0EN
  4. Allowed29 September 20253354261
    Former Moorhurst Care Home, Main Road , Westfield, East Sussex, TN35 4SL
  5. Dismissed10 June 20253352770
    George Inn, High Street, Robertsbridge, TN32 5AW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.