Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 June 20253352770

George Inn, High Street, Robertsbridge, TN32 5AW

Planning appeal 3352770 at George Inn, High Street, Robertsbridge, TN32 5AW (Rother District Council) was dismissed on 10 June 2025 by Inspector Sylvester G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Robertsbridge Conservation Area, and whether it preserves the setting of the Grade II listed building known as The George.

Retention of outbuilding used for storage purposes and associated works (large freestanding fridge/freezer on concrete base with timber framed canopy structure)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Sylvester G
Postcode
TN32 5AW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Robertsbridge Conservation Area, and whether it preserves the setting of the Grade II listed building known as The George
  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of nearby occupants with particular regard to noise and disturbance

What decided it

The harmful effect on the setting of the listed building and character of the conservation area, combined with unmitigated noise harm to nearby residents, outweighed the economic and social benefits to the pub business.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EN2Policy EN3Policy RA1Policy EN5Policy OSS4Policy DM7Policy EC1Policy EC4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 212Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

12 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rother District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed14 October 20266007775
    Land Adjacent to Broadlawns, Whitebread Lane, Beckley, TN31 6TY
  2. Dismissed17 August 20266009653
    150 Barnhorn Road, Bexhill on Sea, TN39 4QL
  3. Dismissed12 May 20266002821
    54-55 High Street, Battle, TN33 0EN
  4. Allowed29 September 20253354261
    Former Moorhurst Care Home, Main Road , Westfield, East Sussex, TN35 4SL
  5. Dismissed21 January 20253345193
    46 North Trade Road, Battle, East Sussex, TN33 0HS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.