Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 November 20243347130

37 Abbeydale Gardens, Kirkstall, LEEDS, LS5 3RG

part two storey part single storey side and rear extension

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Teasdale N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of existing occupiers of No 39 Abbeydale Gardens with particular regard to outlook and daylight/sunlight
  • The effect of the proposed development on access and parking

What decided it

The proposed two-storey rear extension would have a dominant and overbearing effect on the outlook of existing occupiers of No 39 when utilising their garden area, reducing the quality and useability of their outside amenity space, contrary to Policy P10 of the Leeds Core Strategy, Policies GP5 and BD6 of the UDPR, and Policy HDG2 of the SPD.

Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds Core Strategy (as amended by the Core Strategy Selective Review 2019), Policy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006), Policy BD6 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006), Policy HDG2 of the Leeds Householder Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document 2012, Policy T2 of the Leeds Core Strategy

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.