Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 May 20253348009

Tap Farm, Orestan Lane, Effingham, Surrey, KT24 5SL

Planning appeal 3348009 at Tap Farm, Orestan Lane, Effingham, Surrey, KT24 5SL (Guildford Borough Council) was dismissed on 2 May 2025 by Inspector Bale M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, with regard to openness and the purposes of the Green Belt.

change of use to allow dog walking/training in association with the permitted dog day care use and retention of mobile home, shepherds huts, portaloo, parking area and dog exercise enclosures and continued use of approved dog day care uses on site

Appeal type
other · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Unknown
Inspector
Bale M
Postcode
KT24 5SJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, with regard to openness and the purposes of the Green Belt
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The mobile home and wooden hut are necessary welfare facilities that interrupt openness and fail to preserve the Green Belt's purpose of protecting countryside from encroachment, and the limited weight given to other considerations cannot clearly outweigh this harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P2Policy D1Policy D4Policy ENP-G2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

95 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Guildford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed15 October 20266008529
    Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
  2. Allowed14 October 20266009751
    Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266009810
    Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL
  4. Allowed5 October 20266012736
    The Cottage, Blanket Mill Farm, Goose Rye Road, Worplesdon, Guildford, GU3 3RQ
  5. Dismissed23 September 20266009962
    Pentire, The Avenue, Worplesdon, GU3 3RA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.