Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed7 February 20253348292

28 Mavis Avenue, Cookridge, Leeds, LS16 7LJ

first floor side and rear extension, new roof light to front, and conversion of garage to habitable room with new window to front

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Reed J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and wider area
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of 28 Mavis Lane with particular regard to overlooking and a loss of privacy to the garden area

What decided it

The combination of the extension's subservient design and positioning, together with the existing screening features and established pattern of mutual overlooking between the properties, meant the proposal would not cause unacceptable harm to character, appearance or neighbouring living conditions.

Framework references: 135

Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds Core Strategy (as amended 2019), Policy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006), Policy BD6 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006), Policy HDG1 of the Leeds Householder Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2012)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.