Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 May 20253348515

25 Alleyndale Road, Dagenham, RM8 2JQ

Planning appeal 3348515 at 25 Alleyndale Road, Dagenham, RM8 2JQ (London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council) was dismissed on 15 May 2025 by Inspector Francis L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the appeal proposal on the character and appearance of the area including its effect on the significance of Becontree Estate as a Non-Designated Heritage Asset (NDHA).

the construction of a 1 bed 1 person dwelling with associate external amenity, parking space, bicycle store and waste storage at land adjacent to 25 Alleyndale Road

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Francis L
Postcode
RM8 2JQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the appeal proposal on the character and appearance of the area including its effect on the significance of Becontree Estate as a Non-Designated Heritage Asset (NDHA)
  • highway safety, with particular regard to off-street parking provision

What decided it

The moderate harm to the character and appearance of the Becontree Estate as a Non-Designated Heritage Asset and the unmitigated risk of increased on-street parking demand significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited housing benefits of a single dwelling, even under the tilted balance.

The limited benefits of housing delivery and efficient use of land were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the moderate harm to the character and appearance of the area and the significance of the Becontree Estate as a Non-Designated Heritage Asset, and the unresolved harm to highway safety from increased parking demand.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HC1 of the London Plan 2021Policy SP2 of the BDLPPolicy DMD1 of the BDLPPolicy DMD4 of the BDLPLondon Plan Policy T6London Plan Policy T6.1BDLP Policy DMT2London Plan Policy T1London Plan Policies H1 and H2London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policies SD6 and T2Policy D4 of the London Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

509 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed10 April 20266003483
    12 Neville Gardens, Dagenham, Essex, RM8 3QT
  2. Notice upheld17 March 20263332937
    56 Kings Avenue, Romford, RM6 6BB
  3. Notice upheld16 March 20263332931
    532 Becontree Avenue, Dagenham, RM8 3HR
  4. Dismissed12 March 20266001227
    8A Neville Gardens, Dagenham, RM8 3QT
  5. Dismissed27 February 20266001528
    65, Upney Lane, Barking, IG11 9LD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.